Gazing afar
the galaxy of poets, none shines as brightly as William Shakespeare. Indeed,
his ingenious depiction of characters, uncanny medley of vocabulary, and use of
rhetorical devices is unprecedented-to a degree that many scholars referred him
as the creator of western literature. Yet, his greatness lies beyond his
literary prowess. He founded, more than two hundred years ahead of any other
counter-enlightenment authors, romanticism. Intermixed with the script, the
elements of romanticism - individualism, and emphasis on imagination and
emotion - can be perceived throughout his plays, though, despite of having
contradictions, most distinctly, in Henry V.
A romantic play requires an ideal individual
as the protagonist. King Henry V, in Shakespeare’s portrayal, has every
necessities of being one -responsible for the well-being and strength of his
entire nation, brave, prudent, charismatic and has the ability to subdue
personal emotions and feelings. His virtues were initially manifested by the
contrast between his wasteful youth, and then by the discreet and astute ways
he handled affairs. Nevertheless, the ultimate and essential “quest” for Henry
V that truly authenticates his heroism was the battle of Agincourt. Before the
battle, he walked around the camp to see just how desperate and apprehensive
his subjects are - encouraging them, and manifesting once again his charisma
and fellowship. He had been, on a number of occasions, offered a ransom – he
many live, though his companions have to die. It would have been easy for him
to agree, for the odds were greatly against him, though he utterly rejected the
offers, once again showing his courage. Despite being outnumbered five to one, leading
a cadaverous army, Henry V miraculously defeated the French, proving his worthiness.
Romanticism promotes the importance of the intangible
and often spiritual, though crucial elements such as emotions. You can easily
feel the strong passion contained in the lines- love, hate, horror, fear, and
nothing manifested it better than the success of the battle of Agincourt. Although
battle strategies rationalized, partly, Henry V’s success of the battle, the play
suggested that the success was predominantly caused by emotions- desperateness
of the English, contempt and pretension of the French. Desperateness had
evidently sparked the English men’s will to survive, therefore becoming braver,
while pretension and contempt blinded the French men as they charged heedlessly
toward the English’s flank, which ultimately resulted in the utter defeat of
the French. Without the elements of emotion, it would be very hard to justify
Henry’s success.
There are, however Romanticized Henry V is,
some elements of the play that contradicts the spirit of Romanticism. William
Shakespeare believed in exuberant use of language, though the Romantics
promoted concise phrases. Before the battle, King Henry V with his rhetorical skills
encouraged his subjects by saying that only honor, respect, and positive
memories would come out of a battle, which was widely believed by the
Romantics, though neglecting the fact that the only outcomes of wars are
horror, pain, and death, regardless of whether you are the victor or the
vanquished. The battle of Agincourt itself was a mock of Romanticism. With an
idyllic field turned into a death pit, the battle showed that the reality of a
war is much more daunting than the imagined one. Unlike many Romantics, William
Shakespeare’s view of the ideal individual, Henry V, complicates the
conventional distinctions between heroism and villainy. In spite of Henry V’s
virtues, he is, at the same time, a flawed figure. His ruthlessness accompanies his virtues, sometimes even
overshadows them. For instance, in order
to strengthen the stability of his throne, Henry betrays friends such as
Falstaff, and he puts other friends to death in order to uphold the law -
something that seem unethical to most people. In fact,
Henry V’s ruthlessness to the evil is contrary to what Romantics believe: only
Christ-like forgiveness and love can annihilate evil.
There
have been many discussions about Henry V. It is, indeed a very intricate play.
It contains elements that are much Romanticized and elements that are not. Regardless
of the style, Henry V is essentially one of William Shakespeare’s most
accomplished plays – one that its fame may outlast time.
No comments:
Post a Comment